Judge: Trump administration violated law over smog findingsMarch 12, 2018 10:01pm

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The Trump administration violated federal law when it failed to meet a deadline to identify all parts of the U.S. that don't meet air quality standards for smog, a federal judge ruled on Monday.

U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam ordered the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to complete the designations by the end of April.

His ruling was for two lawsuits, including one filed by California, 13 other states and the District of Columbia.

The EPA had until October 1, 2017, to designate what parts of the country were in and out of compliance with tougher smog standards adopted during the Obama administration.

The states' lawsuit said smog can cause or aggravate diseases including heart disease, bronchitis and emphysema, and the new standards would save hundreds of lives each year.

The designations trigger a process that forces polluted regions to take steps to improve air quality.

An email for comment sent to the U.S. Department of Justice was not immediately returned.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement on Monday that the state will "closely monitor" the EPA to make sure it meets the court's order.

"We stand ready to do what's necessary to ensure that the EPA does not shirk its legal responsibilities," he said.

The EPA acknowledged that it violated the Clean Air Act by failing to issue the air quality designations by the October 1 deadline, but said it was moving fast and would complete the process no later than April 30, according to Gilliam's ruling.

Gilliam rejected the states' request that the EPA move faster on some designations and make all designations effective immediately.

Becerra and Democratic officials in other states have repeatedly clashed with the Trump administration over the its push to loosen environmental regulations.

Becerra was joined in the smog suit by the attorneys general in Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington state. Minnesota's Pollution Control Agency also joined the suit.

Page 1 of 1

More Stories Like This

FILE –  In this Aug. 11, 2015 file photo, a La Plata County sheriff notice marks the closure of the Animas River due to the Gold King Mine spill downstream from the mine, in Durango, Colo. The EPA says it has almost finished reviewing hundreds of damage claims from the spill, but the agency has still not released a clear accounting of the claims made for economic losses and personal injuries.  (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley, File)
APNewsBreak: EPA may be overstating claims from mine spill
In this Feb. 8, 2018, photo, Blayne Wittig, executive director of Options for Women of California, left, a center in Concord, Calif., Debbie Whittaker, nurse manager, center, and Christine Vatuone, president and CEO of Informed Choices, talk at Informed Choices, a crisis pregnancy center in Grilroy, Calif. A California law regulating anti-abortion pregnancy centers has led to a Supreme Court clash at the intersection of abortion and free speech. The centers say a law requiring them to tell pregnant clients the state has family planning and abortion care available at little or no cost violates the centers’ free speech rights. Informed Choices is what Vatuone describes as a “life-affirming” pregnancy center. Even as it advertises “free pregnancy services” and promises in signs on its door and inside to discuss all options with pregnant women, Informed Choices exists to steer women away from abortion. (AP Photo/Mark Sherman)
Abortion, free speech collide in Supreme Court dispute
Lawyers call US gun charges for Mexican man 'vindictive'Attorneys for a Mexican man acquitted of murder in a San Francisco shooting are seeking a court order for documents to help them argue his U.S. gun charges are vindictive
FILE - In this June 21, 2017 file photo, Missouri Attorney General Josh Hawley speaks at a news conference in St. Louis.  Missouri is defending a prison sentence for a man who isn’t eligible for parole until “great old age” _ in this case, 112 _ for robbery and other crimes he committed on a single day when he was 16. State Attorney General Josh Hawley says in a Supreme Court filing that defendant Bobby Bostic’s 241-year sentence for 18 separate crimes does not violate the Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment.   (AP Photo/Jim Salter File)
Missouri defends 241-year prison sentence for 16-year-old
Judge upholds Mississippi mandate on doctors who do abortionA federal judge is upholding part of a Mississippi law that says doctors who do abortions must be certified or eligible in obstetrics and gynecology
Man unsuccessfully appeals dismissal of his own chargesA man whose charges of threatening an FBI agent were dismissed when he was deemed incompetent has lost a surprising appeal aimed at forcing prosecutors to take him to trial
This component is currently unavailable.

Related Searches

Related Searches