Honduran man pleads guilty in Florida mall bomb plot caseMarch 14, 2018 3:48pm

MIAMI (AP) — A Honduran man has pleaded guilty to U.S. charges in a plot to detonate a bomb in a Florida mall food court in support of the Islamic State extremist group.

Vicente Adolfo Solano pleaded guilty Wednesday in Miami federal court to a single count of attempting to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization, which carries a maximum 20-year prison sentence. Court records show Solano will be sentenced May 30.

The FBI says the 53-year-old Solano wanted to detonate a bomb last October at the Dolphin Mall near Miami but was actually working with undercover FBI operatives who gave him a fake bomb before his arrest.

Despite Solano's claims of Islamic State sympathies, the FBI says no direct links to terrorist groups were found. Solano never had real explosives.

Page 1 of 1

More Stories Like This

FILE - In this June 21, 2017 file photo, Missouri Attorney General Josh Hawley speaks at a news conference in St. Louis.  Missouri is defending a prison sentence for a man who isn’t eligible for parole until “great old age” _ in this case, 112 _ for robbery and other crimes he committed on a single day when he was 16. State Attorney General Josh Hawley says in a Supreme Court filing that defendant Bobby Bostic’s 241-year sentence for 18 separate crimes does not violate the Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment.   (AP Photo/Jim Salter File)
Missouri defends 241-year prison sentence for 16-year-old
Court: South Carolina law poses risk to student rightsA federal appeals court says South Carolina's 'disturbing schools' law poses a risk to students' freedom of expression and due process
Judge upholds Mississippi mandate on doctors who do abortionA federal judge is upholding part of a Mississippi law that says doctors who do abortions must be certified or eligible in obstetrics and gynecology
Man unsuccessfully appeals dismissal of his own chargesA man whose charges of threatening an FBI agent were dismissed when he was deemed incompetent has lost a surprising appeal aimed at forcing prosecutors to take him to trial
In this Feb. 8, 2018, photo, Blayne Wittig, executive director of Options for Women of California, left, a center in Concord, Calif., Debbie Whittaker, nurse manager, center, and Christine Vatuone, president and CEO of Informed Choices, talk at Informed Choices, a crisis pregnancy center in Grilroy, Calif. A California law regulating anti-abortion pregnancy centers has led to a Supreme Court clash at the intersection of abortion and free speech. The centers say a law requiring them to tell pregnant clients the state has family planning and abortion care available at little or no cost violates the centers’ free speech rights. Informed Choices is what Vatuone describes as a “life-affirming” pregnancy center. Even as it advertises “free pregnancy services” and promises in signs on its door and inside to discuss all options with pregnant women, Informed Choices exists to steer women away from abortion. (AP Photo/Mark Sherman)
Abortion, free speech collide in Supreme Court dispute
Police given OK to hold suspects in Nairobi courthouse plotA Kenyan court is allowing police to continue detaining five people who allegedly planned to attack a Nairobi courthouse so a Muslim cleric facing terror charges could escape
This component is currently unavailable.

Related Searches

Related Searches